English IV Essay due to Dr. Forman Sept. 26
Revise your rough draft into a polished final draft
Due Thur Sept. 26 for A & F periods (both hardcopy in class and email Word attachment)
◊2-4 page polished essay, double-spaced with proper formatting (100 points)
◊Revised, edited, proofread, no more than two errors per page
◊Must have a main point (a point of view, a claim) that is not too obvious
◊Compare and/or contrast two basketball poems (A period)
Or Asimov’s vs. Phillip Dick’s portrayal of robots (F period)
◊Header in upper right hand corner (last name, space, #)
◊Upper left hand corner: name, class, period, date, teacher
◊Title: unique to your essay, should preview your essay topic
◊Opening sentence that hooks the reader
◊Introduction that sets up your argument and context
◊Thesis statement: most specific sentence you can craft that outlines your main argument and analysis. Revise this sentence several times, even after you write your paper.
◊Paragraphs: topic sentences that are not examples, but claims, then quotes, evidence, examples carefully analyzed to show how they support your claims. End paragraphs with your main point or a transition.
◊Conclusion: Your best points and their larger implications. If you use ‘I,’ use it in the conclusion.
◊Proofread carefully for errors, especially these: 1) ‘s possessives
2) its vs. it’s
3) comma before quote: ,” not “,
4) don’t underline your own title
5) don’t space differently between paragraphs
6) poems in quotes, novels in italics (“Fast Break” vs. I, Robot)
7) avoid sentence fragments
8) Works Cited: separate page listing all the works you’ve consulted in alphabetical order
9) avoid comma splices
10) proper imbedded parenthetical citations: “insignia” (Hirsch line 20)
11) don’t risk plagiarism by searching the internet without citing your sources and finally
12) proofread after you print.
Most important of all, in college essays, you must have something to say and know what it is.
Essay Rubric
opening more analysis
MLA header title MLA punctuation introduction
thesis sentence organization clarity of syntax
more precise word choices development of main idea
clarify & exemplify main idea narrow main idea [] details/examples
topic sentences body ¶s closers PROOFREAD
conclusion comma splice agreement ‘s __________
unclear<------------------------THESIS-------------------------->specific
unclear<---------------------ORGANIZED-------------------------->logical
rough<---------------------SENTENCES---------------------------->smooth
Essay Scoring Rubric Score: [______]
A or A-
|
B+ or B
|
B-, C+ or C
|
-outstanding, sharp insight
clear/consistent mastery
-develops ideas
-a few minor errors
|
-effective; demonstrates reasonably consistent mastery
-occasional errors or lapses in quality
|
-competent
-demonstrates adequate mastery
-lapses in quality
|
-insightfully develops a point of view
-outstanding critical thinking
-use striking examples
-2nd source useful
|
-effectively develops a point of view
-demonstrates strong critical thinking
-uses appropriate examples for support
|
-develops point of view
-competent critical
thinking
-adequate examples
to support position
|
-v. well organized &
clearly focused
-demonstrates clear coherence
-smooth progression of ideas, flow
|
-well organized and focused
-demonstrates coherence and progression of ideas
|
-generally organized and focused
-demonstrates some coherence and progression of ideas
|
-exhibits skillful use of language
-uses varied, accurate, apt vocabulary
|
-exhibits facility in the use of language
-uses appropriate vocabulary
|
-adequate but inconsistent facility in the use of lang.
-uses generally appropriate vocab.
|
-demonstrates meaningful variety
in sentence structure
|
-demonstrates variety in sentence
structure
|
-demonstrates some variety in sentence structure
|
-free of most errors in grammar, usage, & mechanics
|
-generally free of most errors in grammar, usage, & mechanics
|
-has some errors in grammar, usage, & mechanics
|
Best essays: Thesis: interesting, arguable, incisive; limited in scope; developed
• Structure: logical, progressive (not just a list), invites complications, counterarguments, with links between points; coherent, well-organized paragraphs • Evidence: convincing, well-chosen; readable and understandable, well-analyzed • Analysis: fresh; more than summary; shows how evidence supports thesis; Quotes: well-chosen cited correctly
Style: clear, conversational yet sophisticated; diction level appropriate to audience; smooth, a pleasure to read
| ||
No comments:
Post a Comment